Updates, Live

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Wong Kar-Wai: Fallen Angels (1995)



It's kind of exhausting and kind of exhilarating. It will appeal to the kinds of people you see in the Japanese animation section of the video store, with their sleeves cut off so you can see their tattoos. And to those who subscribe to more than three film magazines. And to members of garage bands. And to art students. It's not for your average moviegoers—unless of course, they want to see something new.

Almost manga-like in camera style and story telling (I mean manga as in Akira and Ghost in The Shell). Very colorful yet dark, explicit yet tender, soft and violent. You're sucked in by the nostrils, visually shaken about and taken for a very exciting trip into hyper-sub-reality. The daylight at the end has the same effect as the dish cleaning and lights on after a very good party. Very sobering. The movie leaves you with the feeling of having had a vigorous massage and wanting more. More Wong Kar-Wai.

And there is the real star, the traum-city itself. Corridors, subways, neon, time lapse, travelators and low flying jets, trains, shopping arcades, Chung King Mansions stuffed to the gullets with sullen, sweating people cooled by antique electric fans, the scheming tattooed triads, outbursts of random violence, warehouses, chopping knives, video cameras, motorbikes speeding through tunnels, the multiracial hand in hand with the super-commercial... Hong Kong insinuates itself into our imaginations as the Űbertraumstadt, the place of ultimate nightmare and ultimate romance, where beauty is all the more poignant for its dark, cheap, pitiless setting and dreams are all the more necessary.

Bringing a manga to the screen leads to a movie that's structured like a manga, which is far different from the structure of a novel. Manga means cartoons with a few explanatory text. Such a structure is by its nature extremely elliptic, leaving the details unexplained and assuming the active participation of the reader (viewer) who should fill the gaps and make the links. More than that, actually a manga offers only the essential elements, you are to imagine the story behind.


Fallen Angels (墮落天使 - Duo luo tian shi): like the companion movie (Chungking Express), it's a pure cinematographic gem born unexpectedly. Wong Kar-Wai and Chris Doyle were working on Ashes of Time, and the project was exhausting. They decided suddenly to put Ashes of Time on hold and to produce quickly something light, unpretentious, just to warm their spirits. There was no script, just a loose idea: some slices of life in today's Hong Kong, kind of romantic comedies with young heroes hanging around Chungking Mansions and Midnight Express. Two vignettes were made this way, with young cops falling in love, drug dealers wearing sun glasses and blond wigs, barmaids becoming flight attendants and flight attendants returning from San Francisco: this was Chungking Express, released in 1994.

As the third vignette was unfolding, it became clear for the director that the mood of the story was different, and it deserved a separate movie: that was Fallen Angels, released in 1995. Two completely distinct plots evolving in parallel, and intertwining only in brief moments and only by hazard. A young hitman getting his assignments through a fax machine and a sympathetic and totally immature mute (played with irresistible charm by Takeshi Kaneshiro, who was also an irresistible cop-in-love in Chungking Express).

Well, a mute cannot talk, everybody knows it, but what happens in Fallen Angels is that actually nobody seems able to communicate through human speech. The agent (Michelle Reis - I saw her also in Flowers of Shanghai) who gives the assignments to the hitman (and even visits his narrow apartment when he is out) is a gorgeous girl, unconditionally in love for his subordinate. However she never meets him and prefers to masturbate instead. It is a terrifying impression of loneliness in a frenetic city, everybody is alone there, on her or his own, deepened in her or his own thoughts and dreams, and everybody's dreams seem crazy while only dreams keep you there to not get crazy.

I remember the cabs in a region I used to live for many years: the driver had a small computer on board and all communication with the dispatcher was through the screen, no room for bargaining of any kind, no space for any human feeling, of joy or sorrow, of sympathy or sarcasm. Here in Fallen Angels it's the fax machine, the same sensation of alienation, of loss of humanity. Humans transformed in robots, keeping their human condition for themselves only, through masturbating dreams of impossible love.

And it remains the city itself. Mark Rothko (Jacob Baal-Teshuva: Mark Rothko, 1903-1970, Pictures as Drama, Taschen, 2003, p.27) has a great observation about the relation between foreground and background in an art work: sometimes the personages (or the objects) have only the function to glorify the background (... may limit space arbitrarily and thus heroify his objects. Or he makes infinite space, dwarfing the importance of objects, causing them to merge and become part of the space world). The same observation is somehow made by Malevich when analyzing the way Monet had rendered the Cathedral of Rouen: ...when the artist paints, and he plants the paint, and the object is his flower-bed, he must sow the paint in such a way that the object disappears, because it is merely a ground for the visible paint with which it is painted (Gilles Néret: Kazimir Malevich, 1878-1935, and Suprematism, Taschen, 2003, p.13).

Is this movie about people alienated by Hong Kong, or is it here a meditative poem about the city itself? One of the personages in the movie has an unexpected sentence, Buddha said, If I don't descend into hell, who will? The sentence passes quickly and seems at first sight without any meaning in the logic of the story. Maybe it offers the clue: Hong Kong, this space of hyper-sub-reality (as one of the reviewers puts it), this Űbertraumstadt of ultimate nightmare (apud another reviewer), actually offers the image of hell, and the heroes of the story descend there, why? To follow the archetype?

And if we go again to the observation made by Malevich on Monet and Rouen Cathedral, here in Fallen Angels subject and city disappear in the gorgeous cinematic language: a great movie pushing the cinematic language to its ultimate expression. A couple of great creators: Wong Kar-Wai and Chris Doyle. Let me add here that another great contemporary cinematographer was also part in the team: Mark Lee Ping-Bin.

And if I were to choose an image from Fallen Angels, this one would be: the city in the night with its endless traffic and movement and changing lights, near the narrow apartment where the hitman inspects quietly the fax machine.


墮落天使 (Fallen Angels): Part 1/10
(video by tooomat)




墮落天使 (Fallen Angels): Part 2/10
(video by tooomat)





墮落天使 (Fallen Angels): Part 3/10
(video by tooomat)





墮落天使 (Fallen Angels): Part 4/10
(video by tooomat)





墮落天使 (Fallen Angels): Part 5/10
(video by tooomat)



墮落天使 (Fallen Angels): Part 6/10
(video by tooomat)






墮落天使 (Fallen Angels): Part 7/10
(video by tooomat)






墮落天使 (Fallen Angels): Part 8/10
(video by tooomat)






墮落天使 (Fallen Angels): Part 9/10
(video by tooomat)






墮落天使 (Fallen Angels): Part 10/10
(video by tooomat)


-----

Some useful links:



(Wong Kar-Way and Chris Doyle)

Labels: ,

Friday, July 01, 2011

Days of Being Wild (1990)


Days of Being Wild (阿飛正傳 - A Fei jingjyuhn, The True Story of a Playboy ), made in 1990 by Wong Kar-Way. It was his second feature film, the first to collaborate with cinematographer Chris Doyle, the first to follow his artistic obsessions. The movie had a great cast: Leslie Cheung, Maggie Cheung, Carina Lau, Andy Lau, Rebecca Pan, Jacky Cheung, all these along with Tony Leung Chiu Wai (who played in a cameo). Despite all these assets the movie started by being a commercial failure (as the director told once, in Korea the attendance even threw things at the screen). The style of Wong Kar-Wai (or the style of Chris Doyle, or both) was simply too new, too unexpected.

Years have passed and Wong Kar-Wai (along with Chris Doyle) became well-known worldwide, and each of their movies is now considered as iconic. I wouldn't get tired watching any of their movies as many times as it gets: each time I understand a nuance in more depth.

What could be told in a few words about this movie, Days of Being Wild? For Pavel Ruminov the spirit of Nabokov lives in WKW heroes' rooms. For another reviewer (tedg) this movie draws fluid tattoos on the insides of skin. For chaos-rampant this is raw and touching and real, like the best of gritnik cinema done by a romantic. And tedg again, this movie is the first project where Kar-Wai Wong found his groove with the Spanish notion of meta-story.

Well, meta-story, or meta-narrative, whatever: other stories built within the main story, each of the embedded stories with a life and a poignancy of their own, unfolding without haste, while not impeding on the main story - chapels in a cathedral. You have the sensation of being there, everything has such an immediacy that it's like it happens to you, right there during the screening. There is the main character, a womanizer dreaming to find someday his estranged mother, meanwhile seducing and then getting rid of everything he meets, abusive and careless in all his relations, with men and women alike; there are the girls, seduced and abandoned; there are the other men, witnessing all this and falling for the girls, hopelessly... and it's like you are there, in the skin of each personage, as each of the embedded stories is flowing, as the main story is flowing, you are the womanizer, leaving sentimental carnage on your way, you are each girl, enjoying your erotic accomplishment, rejected, despaired, you are each of the men, empathizing with the girls, trying to help them, longing for them, you are the substitute mother, ambiguous in your feelings for the boy you raised, you are the real mother, not showing anything which is in your heart, not even to yourself.

Peter Brunette has and admirable essay about Days of Being Wild: with this movie Wong was fully immersed in what would become his greatest themes, love and time.

Days of Being Wild is considered as the first part in a loose trilogy dealing with love and time (together with In the Mood for Love and 2046). Actually love and time (maybe better said eros and time) remained the preoccupation also in the movies following this so-called trilogy: think for instance at The Hand, WK-W's episode from Eros, made in 2004 - and the preoccupation remains also in My Blueberry Nights (which is also a meta-story, by the way).

All these movies mirroring love and time in countless ways. Time marked by the passing of histories of love replacing the passing of years, down to implosion: stories of seduction, stories of desire, stories of love just imagined, stories of longing, stories of despair. Love trying to destroy the reality of time: I've heard that there's a kind of bird without legs that can only fly and fly, and sleep in the wind when it is tired; the bird only lands once in its life... that's when it dies. Time as illusion, love as illusion - time has lost any significance, because it was replaced by histories of love - while love exploded and lost any meaning from the very beginning - reality as illusion: the fact is that the bird hasn't gone anywhere; it was dead from the beginning.




Days of Being Wild: Part 1/11
(video by kuraxmol)




Days of Being Wild: Part 2/11
(video by kuraxmol)




Days of Being Wild: Part 3/11
(video by kuraxmol)




Days of Being Wild: Part 4/11
(video by kuraxmol)




Days of Being Wild: Part 5/11
(video by kuraxmol)




Days of Being Wild: Part 6/11
(video by kuraxmol)




Days of Being Wild: Part 7/11
(video by kuraxmol)





Days of Being Wild: Part 8/11
(video by kuraxmol)




Days of Being Wild: Part 9/11
(video by kuraxmol)




Days of Being Wild: Part 10/11
(video by kuraxmol)





Days of Being Wild: Part 11/11
(video by kuraxmol)



(Wong Kar-Way & Chris Doyle)

Labels: ,

Monday, February 21, 2011

Wong Kar-Wai - My Blueberry Nights (2007)

The mirror... it's broken. I like it that way. Makes me look the way I feel (sabbaroo)


She comes every night to a small café in SoHo, looking for solace after a break-up. He runs the place and knows how to listen words and silences. Between them a blueberry pie that works wonders. He falls for her, she needs firstly to come to her own terms. So she leaves New York for a journey coast to coast, working as a waitress in different towns and knowing various people with their stories. In a pub in Memphis a long time botched couple, ending miserably. The survivor will have a ghost to carry. In a casino some place in Nevada an embittered gambler, hiding another ghost. Everybody seems to be there either a skeleton or a zombie, with a skeleton in charge.

One day she will return to the café in SoHo. Life can also be nice.





My Blueberry Nights - Trailer
(video by edgarfracg)

It's My Blueberry Nights, made by Wong Kar-Wai in 2007. She is Norah Jones, at her first movie role. He is Jude Law. The couple in Memphis is played by David Strathairn and Rachel Weisz. The Nevada gambler is Natalie Portman. It is the first movie Wong Kar-Wai made in America, with an American cast, also the first time he did not collaborate with Chris Doyle. Here the Director of Photography was Darius Khondji, the lonesome lens man who made Pollack, Allen, Fincher, Boyle, Polanski, and Bertolucci look so fine (richard_sleboe).




Hate is baggage, life's too short to be pissed off all the time (insomniac_rod)



It's Wong Kar-Way, so first thought goes to Chungking Express: neon colors generously flooding the place, great dreamy shots bathed in music and making the universe look psychedelic (which it probably is, why not?), the small coffee shop where passed loves are cured and new loves look so promising, young sweet heroes whose lives are flooded with sweet crazy details (the café in SoHo carries a Russian name - КЛЮЧ - as a former flame in the life of the young man was a superb Russian, Katya; also КЛЮЧ is the Russian for KEY, which sends to the glass full of keys on the countertop - keys of passed loves waiting to be taken back or thrown away; the postcards sent every day by the young girl from every town on her journey, without giving any clue about her actual address). English spoken with all kind of accents (Mancunian, Muscovite, Tennessean, to name just a few), whirled together. And above all the blueberry pie.

Don't forget that the young heroine is a waitress in both My Blueberry Nights and Chungking Express. And don't forget the cop in both movies.





My Blueberry Nights - Cat Power
(video by MidnightVera)



So it calls in mind Chungking Express, which is a masterpiece. The problem is that nobody cannot create the same masterpiece twice, not even Wong Kar-Wai. Understandably many reviewers were slightly disappointed, some even very critical.

It is true that you find here the same cinematic language as in Chungking Express, only we should observe that a movie is not only about cinematic language.

Chungking Express has a formidable sense of immediacy, it's a spontaneous flow: slices of life not ordered by some logic, evolving on their own with no predictability. The two stories in the movie end with no resolution; just a moment in life chosen by random.

Here in My Blueberry Night the evolution is predictable. We are following a story with a start and an end and we are waiting the heroine to come back one day to New York and to commence her new love.

And the first feeling is that's not Wong Kar-Wai. Said one reviewer, it's Wong Kar-Wai lite.




At the end of the day, this is Wong Kar Wai to the bones: every frame is an exquisite color scheme, dreamy languid music (or at times complete silence) and all the rest of it (harry_tk_yung)



Imho these critics miss an important point: Wong Kar-Wai created not only Chungking Express; In the Mood for Love is another great movie and it is quite different.

Actually I would think now at another work of Wong Kar-Wai, the segment he created for the movie Eros: the segment is named The Hand and it's a small gem. It's a poignant description of a tragic destiny, a description flooded with an intoxicating erotic desire, told with a minimalism that's simply exquisite.

What seems to me is that there are two roads in the work of Wong Kar-Wai (let's say the one in Chungking Express and the other in In the Mood for Love - or in The Hand) and here in My Blueberry Nights he wants to put them together. If the whole sends us to Chungking Express, the two episodes in Memphis and Nevada send directly to the poignancy of In the Mood for Love and The Hand. Someone observed once that some movies of Almodovar could be viewed as a cathedral and its chapels (well, the observations continued that the cathedral was Kitsch and its chapels Gothic). Here in My Blueberry Nights the romance of the two sympathetic lead characters is the cathedral hosting the two episodes. I would say, the romance is Wong Kar-Wai-lite because it's just a pretext: the Gothic stays in the episodes.




it's like what happens with Lucía y el sexo: Paz Vega is the leading but the movie belongs to the female supporters: Elena Anaya and Najwa Nimri (lauburu100)


Each of the two episodes, in Memphis and Nevada, is amazing: each one has the essentiality of a morality tale. It's the tragedy of the couple: the love has disappeared you don't know when, you hate the other, you hate yourself, you cannot escape. You carry the ghost of the other whatever you try, wherever you go, regardless the other is alive or dead. You are a ghost.

And David Strathairn, as well as Rachel Weisz, as well as Natalia Portman, play amazingly.




My Blueberry Nights - Clip
(video by OptimumReleasing)


Paris (ou SoHo?) est tout petit pour ce qui s'aiment d'un aussi grand amour (mpsgs710)



My Blueberry Nights - The Kiss Scene
(video by Ren0405)

----
And here is a documentary about the making of the movie (the four consecutive videos were published on youTube by Golden Dragon Pictures; as embedding was disabled I have indicated the link for each of the four parts; I inserted also some comments found on the web).


The film was shot on location at the Palacinka Cafe in SoHo in New York City, the South Main Arts District in Memphis, and Caliente, Ely, and Las Vegas in Nevada.Palacinka Cafe, 28 Grand Street and Thompson Street, Manhattan - the cafe has since closed after losing their lease and been taken over by a Beauty Salon.


This is obligatory viewing for romantics, with a touch of cynical realism; and it's a pity that one's own local café proprietor is not as caring and gorgeous as Jeremy. Jeremy has the typical personality that most male characters have in Wong Kar Wai's movies, that is, stubbornly persistent, sentimental, sensitive, observant, empathetic (but self-absorbed sometimes)…as well as reticent (personally speaking, Jeremy is even more lovable because he enjoys eating desserts).

David Strathairn reminds me of Garry Cooper: the same profile.
A bit too Tennessee Williams for my taste.


I'm not sure whether that night really happened, or if it was just another dream.
Nice movie, like a slow song in a shady café.

(Wong Kar-Way & Chris Doyle)

Labels:

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Chungking Express (1994)

1994: work on Ashes of Time was extremely demanding, kind of never-ending doing and re-doing of scenes, on the verge of breakdown. A two-months hiatus appeared (they had to wait for some new equipment) and Wong Kar-Wai suddenly decided to make quickly a totally different movie, just to follow his instincts (as he would later say in an interview). No screenplay, dialogs and situations were decided each day on the spot. The result was one of the most important movies of our time: Chung Hing Sam Lam (Chungking Express), so innovative in the use of camera and soundtrack that it leaves you speechless. Cinematographer Chris Doyle simply revolutionized here the art of filming. The name of Jean-Luc Godard is always reminded when people talk about Chungking Express; I would say that this movie is as innovative as only Man with a Camera was.

Is it possible for a cop to get in love? Of course it is, and when the cop is young it is even nice. Well, the movie comprises two unrelated stories, with young cops in love. Undercover cop 223 was left by his girlfriend, and he falls for a mysterious woman with a blond wig. It happens that she is a drug smuggler. Does it matter? As for the second half of the film, uniformed cop 633 was left by his girlfriend and now a girl working at Midnight Express falls for him. As I am a nice guy, I wouldn't deconspire more of the plot.

Lan Kwai Fong


The title comes from the name of two places in Hong Kong: Midnight Express is a fast-food in Lan Kwai Fong (kind of Hong Kong version of SoHo); Chungking Mansions (where most of the first half of the movie takes place) is a mall-cum-flophouse, noisy, dingy, down-market place incredibly located right in the midst of Tsim Sha Tsui, a very chic Hong Kong area. I hadn't (yet?) the opportunity to be there. but I was once at Chelsea Market in Manhattan and I thought immediately at the movie of Wong Kar-Wai.

Chungking Mansions


Don't look for a logic in this movie, because any logic would be fake; Wong doesn't try to arrange the moments in some succession, because each moment exists on its own, carries its own truth and doesn't care about the rest. Instead of a synthesis the movie offers non-related glimpses; instead of an ultimate truth it offers contradictory slices of truth. It's not life as we think it should be: it's life as it is.

It's soaked in neon lights. It's fun, it's noisy, it's fast. And, above all, it's filled with incredible, hypnotic poetry.

The right word for this movie would be mesmerizing. Enjoy!







(Wong Kar-Way & Chris Doyle)

(Michael Galasso)

Labels: , ,

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Eros (2004)

Eros brings together three very different filmmakers, who are telling us, each in his own way, stories about love/lust/desire/dreams.

The first segment (The Hand) is made by Wong Kar -Wai, with Christopher Doyle as cinematographer. It's a pure gem, gorgeous and intoxicating. Two very good actors: Gong Li and Chen Chang (the bandit from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon). It's the Weltanschaung of Wong Kar-Wai, where eros is actually a mean to meditate about time: time that heals everything while not solving anything; time that's as illusory as happiness is; time that breaks any hope in the end, while showing you that it doesn't matter.

I found the segment on youTube; unfortunately it has no subtitles, so if you aren't familiar with Chinese you are kind of lost, so I will try to summarize the plot: a tailor sends an apprentice to one of his rich customers, who is a high-class courtesane in her prime; she has the sadistic impulse to humiliate sexually the boy. This creates a strange dependence of unrequited lust, that grows through the years, while the courtesane is gradually loosing her status. The rich patrons leave her, the means to keep her style are vanishing and she eventually becomes a prostitute of the lowest kind. The apprentice remains attached to her down to the end and puts all his erotic desire in creating a dress that substitutes for him the woman.



Eros, The Hand: Part 1/5
(video by taxidermisst)




Eros, The Hand: Part 2/5
(video by taxidermisst)




Eros, The Hand: Part 3/5
(video by taxidermisst)




Eros, The Hand: Part 4/5
(video by taxidermisst)




Eros, The Hand: Part 5/5
(video by taxidermisst)



Let's pass now to the second segment (Equilibrium), created by Steven Soderbergh. It's a different kind of an animal: a voyeuristic puzzle based on circular references. A guy (wonderfully played by Robert Downey Jr.) comes to the shrink to complain about an obsessive recurrence: a splendid woman appears naked in his dreams, bathing and dressing in front of him. The shrink puts the patient on the coach and makes him tell all details, while trying to live the dream by himself ! Eventually the patient falls asleep on the coach and the shrink leaves the room. The patient wakes up in front of the woman of his dreams: she's actually his wife and the dream was the visit to the doctor! Or the other way around :)


Eros, Equilibrium (the segment of Soderbergh)
Introductory Scene
(video by AtticusFinch71)



(scene from Equilibrium)


(scene from Equilibrium)



As for the third segment (Il filo pericoloso delle cose - The Dangerous Thread of Things), made by Michelangelo Antonioni, it was considered by many reviewers as the weakest part of the movie. Actually the segment of Antonioni is exquisite: an erotic fantasy subtly suggesting the sagesse of women in these matters. And you cannot compare the three segments in any way; each one follows a totally different approach.


Eros, The Dangerous Thread of Things (the segment of Antonioni)
Introductory Scene
(video by AtticusFinch71)


(Scene from The Dangerous Thread of Things)


(Wong Kar-Way & Chris Doyle)

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

In the Mood for Love


Fa yeung nin wa (In the Mood for Love, 2000) represents a moment that separates two distinct periods in the artistic creation of Wong Kar-Wai.

The movies made before In the Mood for Love offer kaleidoscopic images of today's urban life (with a notable exception, Ashes of Time); all of them (Ashes of Time included) are splendid post-modern works.

With In the Mood for Love the focus is passing on a single dimension of life, eros. It's not the mechanic of sex, it's the mechanic of desire and dream: reality and imagination blur their borders, feelings burn everything and move the compass back and forth between what it is and what it should be.

I think In the Mood for Love should be watched together with 2046: they are somehow symmetric. The feelings burn everything up to explosion in 2046, and time is no more, there is not a succession of love stories, because each love story in 2046 exists on its own and doesn't care about the rest. In the Mood for Love offers another outcome: feelings burn everything down to implosion, the whole becomes so dense that it vanishes in a black hole.

And maybe it's not only about eros in these movies. Maybe it's about time as an illusion; or maybe it's more than that, about reality (our reality as we feel it) as an illusion. And, at this level of understanding, the two periods in Wong Kar-Wai creation are only apparently distinct.

And coming back to In the Mood for Love, when does the action take place? In the sixties, or later in the seventies, when the personages remember their past (or just imagine a past that wasn't)? Or is 2046 already present?


----------------------


I found some time ago the whole movie on youTube, along with some extras (deleted scenes, alternate ending). Unfortunately those videos are no longer available. I will post here instead two videos:  Yumanji's theme (which is sort of trailer, with music composed by Shigeru Umebayashi), and Angkor Vat finale (with music composed by Michael Galasso)





Fa yeung nin wa (In the Mood for Love): Angkor Wat Finale
(music by Michael Galasso)
(video by semektet)


----------------------


Speaking about the finale (Angkor Vat), I meditated on it a lot. At the beginning it seemed without connection with the rest of the movie. Actually, it offers a resolution to a story of love that proved impossible. Only this resolution is on a superior plan. The image of the ancient temples is telling us that our dramas have always happened and will always happen, while not having the importance we think. Life transcends our dramas. The Angkor Vat finale called the movies of Ozu in my mind.


(Wong Kar-Way & Chris Doyle)

(Michael Galasso)

Labels: , ,

Monday, April 12, 2010

Hua Yang De Nian Hua

Hua Yang De Nian Hua was made by Wong Kar-Wai in 2000. It is a 3 minutes collage of scenes from very old Chinese movies, considered long lost, till a few nitrate prints were discovered in a Californian warehouse, some time in the nineties.

Wong Kar-Wai put them together and gave us this jewel. For him it was the inspiration to start the work for In the Mood for Love.

The score (that would be used also in In the Mood for Love) is a golden oldie, a gramophone record of Zhou Xuan, a famous film actress from the forties, nicknamed Golden Voice.




(Wong Kar-Way & Chris Doyle)

Labels:

Marina Tsvetaeva, There's Only One Sun


Солнце - одно, а шагает по всем городам.
Солнце - мое. Я его никому не отдам.
Ни на час, ни на луч, ни на взгляд. - Никому. - Никогда!
Пусть погибают в бессменной ночи города!
В руки возьму! Чтоб не смело вертеться в кругу!
Пусть себе руки, и губы, и сердце сожгу!
В вечную ночь пропадет - погонюсь по следам...
Солнце мое! Я тебя никому не отдам!

There’s only one sun - but it travels the world everyday.
This sun is all mine and I won’t ever give it away!
I will share not an hour of warmth, not a beam of its light!
I’ll let cities perish in the constant, unchangeable night!
I will hold it up with my hands, till it ceases to turn!
I don’t care if my hands, lips and heart must get burned!
Let it vanish in darkness and rushing, I’ll follow its way!
My darling, my sunlight! I won’t ever give you away!



Wong Kar Wai gave a cinematic replica, in 2007. Putting the beauty in new dresses (a suggestion of thriller Sci-Fi). Keeping the essence: longing for love.

Let the feelings burn you, up to explosion. Let them blind you. Then stay close, feel their heat, touch them.




(Wong Kar-Way & Chris Doyle)

(Жизнь в Kнигах)

Labels:

Wednesday, April 07, 2010

A Tribute to Christopher Doyle

Almost all images are from movies of Wong Kar-Wai. Almost, not all. Chris Doyle worked also with guys like Gus Van Sant. And he made also some movies on his own.



You see the world, you end up in jail three or four times, you accumulate experience. And it gives you something to say. If you don't have anything to say then you shouldn't be making films. It's nothing to do with what lens you're using.

(Wong Kar-Way & Chris Doyle)

Labels: ,

Wong Kar Wai & Chris Doyle


It is impossible to talk about one of them without mentioning the other. Wong Kar Wai created a new cinematic language, or a new way to tell stories. This new language, this new way, have as a fundamental dimension the manner in which Chris Doyle understands the image.



There is also another great contemporary contemporary cinematographer working often with Wong Kar Wai: it is Lee Pin-Bing.

(Hong Kong Cinema)

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 01, 2008

Wong Kar-Wai and His Life in Movies

Wong Kar-Wai is perhaps the most important post-modernist filmmaker; the most original for sure. It is much to say about any of his movies, about Ashes of Time, Chungking Express or Fallen Angels, In the Mood for Love or 2046, or The Hand, his segment in the movie created together with Sodebergh and Antonioni (Eros).

I cannot be but subjective: were I to decide among them, my choice would go to Chungking Express and The Hand.

I watched today the trailer for My Blueberry Nights: his most recent film, and the first English-language one. My Blueberry Nights stars Jude Law, Norah Jones, Rachel Weisz and Natalie Portman: Newsweek summarizes it as a road movie about a woman on the rebound.

Well, the movie universe of Wong Kar-Wai is dual: the movies he has created, the movies he has watched. Here is his choice (Newsweek):

One could easily notice in Wong Kar-Wai's movies the qualities he is praising at the other masters: poetry and sensuality, humor, wisdom and humanity. Of course, humor at Kar-Wai manifests differently than at Ozu; also humanity is shown differently. Perhaps Kar-Wai is closer to Godard (and not only on the poetic side).

I've just ordered on the Amazon Spring in a Small Town: it is vaunted there as a classic example of Eastern cinema.

It is a shame that I couldn't yet make it to see any movie of Satyajit Ray: finding them is difficult. However, I hope I will watch some of them in near future. I learned about Ray more than forty years ago. I was in high school and I read a book about India, written by an Austrian journalist. One of the chapters was refering to Indian cinematography: I knew by that time the name of Raj Kapoor, the director of Awaara. The book was mentioning Kapoor, then it was presented a totally different filmmaker, Satyajit Ray.

As for Early Autumn, it is the one from Ozu's movies that I haven't seen yet. I greatly enjoyed his Late Spring (but here again one cannot be but subjective: all his movies made after the war are great)

I will come back soon on all these movies.


(Wong Kar-Way and Chris Doyle)

Labels: , , ,