Updates, Live

Sunday, March 31, 2019

Ozu: Tôkyô no onna (Woman of Tokyo), 1933

Yoshiko Okada in Tôkyô no onna
(image source: 16 Frames per Second)
no copyright infringement intended


Although many of the characteristics of Ozu's unique shooting style are already in place here -- low angles, fixation on glowing lights, still-life interiors -- the film ends with something not seen at all in his later work ... a very deliberate dolly shot along an empty street. It seems to imply that "life goes on." In his more mature work, the director would make this statement without movement. (TajLV in Letterboxd)

Characteristic of his early films, Ozu addresses contemporary social issues by examining the dissolution of family. Using domestic setting and confined, interior shots, Ozu illustrates the intrinsic interrelation between the individual and the environment: the opening image of Chikako by the kitchen sink that is paralleled in the shot of women washing their hands at the cabaret; the transitional shot of Chikako applying makeup at home that is repeated in the grooming of the hostesses; the close-up image of Chikako’s delicate footsteps upon returning home that is contrasted against Ryoichi’s awkward sandals as he wanders through the evening streets (Acquarello)

The restrained, tremulous performances capture the constant tension of decorum and secrecy, while Ozu’s impulsive, intensely expressive images conjure the riot of inner disorder; few directors have invented, as audaciously yet as quietly, a visual grammar all their own (The NewYorker)

Ozu regular Chishū Ryū has a small role towards the end of the film as a reporter (wikipedia)







(Yasujiro Ozu and Setsuko Hara)

Labels:

Saturday, March 30, 2019

Ozu: Dekigokoro (Passing Fancy), 1933

Chôko Iida and Takeshi Sakamoto in Dekigokoro
(image source: Thomas Bigham on youTube)
no copyright infringement intended


By 1933, Ozu was already a well-seasoned professional, and Passing Fancy was just one of three masterpieces he filmed during that year (Senses of Cinema)

Then again, Ozu has always made extraordinary out of the ordinary (crossbow0106: Another Stellar Ozu Film)

Often it is the small details that stand out - holding that frame of the suburban background just an extra second or two after after the character exits - a small touch, but one that allows time for reflection (thinbeach: Classic Ozu)

Ozu regular Chishū Ryū has a small role towards the end of the film as a fellow passenger on board a ship (wikipedia)

A word also about the screenwriter, Tadao Ikeda: he came to prominence writing screenplays for such directors as Ozu, Naruse, Yoshimura, and Shimazu (wikipedia)








(Yasujiro Ozu and Setsuko Hara)

Labels:

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Austen, Chekhov, Ozu, Hopper, Chardin

Chardin, The Silver Beaker
oil on canvas, c. 1750
Musée du Louvre
(source: wikiart)
no copyright infringement intended

An English novelist from the Regency times, a Russian playwright and short-stories author living at the end of the 19th century, a Japanese director of the 1930s/40s/50s, and an American painter contemporary with the Japanese. Do they have something in common? Is it for them a proximate genus? Then what are their specific differences? The universe they are dealing with in their works is up to a point similar: a thin section sliced with peculiar attention in the medium to lower level of gentility or bourgeoisie/intelligentsia, mixed with all kind of picturesque guys, like perpetual students aspiring sometimes to the status of small clerics or clergymen (it depends on the epoch), plus one or more wise and rather skeptical doctors or professors, or other enigmatic individuals (sometimes on the brink of failure). And this universe is explored with great empathy and nobility, and with tireless dedication. Their approach is not demiurgical, like at so many other creators; they let their personages to play by themselves, the situations to evolve freely; and they, the creators, are just there, on the side, enjoying the uniqueness of some moments, all other times just admiring the holiness of the mundane, and meditating maybe, at the ways life goes on.

And maybe the French rococo painter is not too far (if not for the universe, at least for the approach).



(Jane Austen)

(Chekhov)

(Yasujiro Ozu and Setsuko Hara)

(Hopper)

(Chardin)

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, March 30, 2012

Yasujirō Ozu and Setsuko Hara

Setsuko Hara in a cast photo (?)
(Bôrô no kesshitai - Watchtower Suicide Squad)
New Year 1943, Yingpu (North Korea - Mandchuria border)

no copyright infringement intended
(http://httpmyblogblogspotcom-ambrose.blogspot.com/2011/07/new-year-1943-actress-setsuko-hara.html)







(Japanese Cinema)

Labels: ,

Monday, December 27, 2010

A Silent Film of Ozu: I Graduated, But...


A college graduate has moved to Tokyo and started looking for work. It is difficult, the year is 1929 and the crisis just begun. He gets an interview and goes there to be offered a very low position. He rejects the job and returns to the small rented room he lives in, to find there his fiancee along with his mother: they came to celebrate his new start. He hides them the truth and in the following days he leaves in the morning pretending he's going to work. The fiancee discovers the truth and is decided to find a job for herself, to help with money. He goes in the evenings in a bar to have a beer and finds her there working as a waitress. He is firstly furious, then he realizes her sacrifice and decides to accept the offer he got at the interview. So he goes back to find out that the offer was just to test him: actually he will work in a much better position.

It's Ozu hundred percent: nice middle class guys understanding their mistakes as they get lessons of life from their loved ones. The social situation is harsh, but the tone of Ozu is mild, his empathy for the personages is total. Says Donald Richie in his monumental monograph consecrated to the great Japanese director, he (Ozu) was always ready to accept human nature as he found it... (and) he went on to celebrate it.

I Graduated, But... (Daigaku wa detakereda) is one of the movies of Ozu that is lost. Released in 1929, it was 100 minutes long. What remained are some fragments that have together a length of ten minutes. At least they offer a good summary of the plot.


It is unfortunate that the whole movie is no more. Critics consider it as marking the emergence of what is known as the style of Ozu. You can see in the fragments put together in the video: think at the poster with Harold Lloyd that keeps on coming on the screen, think at the two kids playing the ball, think at the scenes in the bar. And don't forget the train that appears a second, in the end! As I said, it's Ozu hundred percent, the amazing Ozu.

-----

Here is what Ozu himself said about this movie. I found this at


I cast Takada Minoru and Tanaka Kinuyo for the first time in this film. I had made a good number of student films, but when it came to filming young actors, it was hard to go beyond the old themes of salarymen or college life. However, in those days, the images of white-collar types were limited. As for students, they were of course a different breed from the ones nowadays, who get into fights with the police. They were all very carefree, and comparatively easy fodder for jokes in nonsense comedies. Shimizu Hiroshi originally wanted to direct this film, but somehow, the script fell into my lap. I thought, if I was determined to be a director, then I must get to grips with any genre and make every film as well as I could. It's all very well for the so-called film auteur to have artistic ideas but one also needs the professional flair for handling all the different aspects of filmmaking. Admittedly, excessive professionalism could spell trouble, but I was nonetheless extremely grateful for the chance to develop my professionalism through making these kinds of films.


(Yasujiro Ozu and Setsuko Hara)

Labels:

Friday, November 05, 2010

35 Rhums



35 Rhums (35 Shots of Rum, created in 2008 by French director Claire Denis) has the subtlety and tenderness of a miniature painting. The charm is hidden in infinitesimal details.

The long opening sequence that watches without haste commuter trains running toward the large city calls in mind Ozu, and, yes, the movie is a tribute to the great Japanese master: a replica to Late Spring, offering at least two surprises.

Firstly, it's Ozu filtered through the lens of Hou Hsiao-Hsien: a replica to Late Spring calling in mind Café Lumière; a French director reenacting a Japanese classic with the sensibility of a modern Taiwanese.

Secondly, while transplanting the Japanese movie from 1949 in today's Paris, 35 Rhums explores other potentialities of the story. Which opens new horizons: after all, the choices made by the heroes in Late Spring raise questions with multiple answers.




Like in Late Spring there is a widowed father with a daughter in her twenties. The father is of African descent, a train engineer at RER (the transit system around Paris). The daughter is studying anthropology. Like in Late Spring, both have a quiet middle-class life in the outskirts of the big city. For the father the same dilemma: realizing that the daughter should leave him and make her own life. Like in Late Spring, there is a prospect groom for the daughter, also a prospect new wife for the father (here is serious, though, while in the Japanese movie the father was faking). The friend who got remarried in Late Spring (a warning against loneliness) became in 35 Rhums a coworker just retired and getting quickly alienated by solitude. Even the father's assistant from Late Spring, briefly viewed as a possible match for the girl, is appearing here in 35 Rhums: a colleague of the daughter, briefly trying to date her.




The two stories keep (loosely) the same line. The quiet and warm everyday between father and daughter is disrupted by a chain of totally unconnected events leading to the same conclusion: the daughter will build her own life, the father will face loneliness (getting space now for the 35 shots of rum). Even the trip made by father and daughter before her marriage can be found in both movies: a trip that offers the chance to talk about the long missing mother. The trip in Late Spring is to the ancient city of Kyoto, while in 35 Rhums it is to mother's birthplace: a German town that kept its medieval allure. But the similarities between the two movies end here.

Unlike the Japanese classic, 35 Rhums is not interested at all in the plot. Without making the connection to Late Spring you wouldn't get it too much. You would realize at some point that both father and daughter speak also German fluently, you should then realize that the mother was (maybe) born in Germany, you wouldn't get it what's with the 35 shots of whatever, and were you to be too stubborn, you wouldn't even get it who's getting eventually married with whom.

And that is because for the French director it is the web of human relationships that counts. Human relations, their warmth, their potentialities, never totally fulfilled, the never told dreams and hopes, the brief looks that speaks tones of volumes where words would say nothing, this is what Claire Denis is looking for in this movie. Discovering the unseen light that comes from within, celebrating it as infinite joy, and infinite ambiguity, of love; celebrating the mundane as scene for this ambiguous, pure, infinite, love. It's Ozu seen through the lens of Hou Hsiao-Hsien, a classic story subtly re-told with contemporary sensibility.

This fluidity of the plot offers room for ambiguity: ambiguity of what's happening, ambiguity of sentiments. Father and daughter have built a universe of their own where they feel perfectly fine, all other relations (the father with the woman who loves him, the daughter with the man whom she eventually will marry) are kept in some sort of a backup, never rejected, never properly treated, just delaying them for later, for that you never know. This while all feel that time never stops, never comes back, never repeats lost occasions.

There is a superb scene that shows all this. Father and daughter, along with their prospects, are going to a concert. The car breaks, it's raining hardly, and they notice a small African restaurant. It's closed, they knock at the door, the owner reopens for them. A drink to get warmed, while the owner prepares some quick dishes, they start to dance, the father with his girlfriend, then with his daughter, the young man with the daughter, the father with the young waitress, each pair is exhaling a sense of intimacy noted with a vague discomfort by the others, while this intimacy is actually filling the whole space, is conquering everybody.



(video by botez)

Well, you would ask me what's about with the 35 shots of rum? C'est une vieille histoire (it's an old story) says the father when asked... but you should see the movie for yourselves to understand.


(Cinéma Français)

Labels: ,

Friday, March 12, 2010

Talking About Ozu

This post is about three videos no longer available. I replaced the videos with images, that's it! So, I'm speaking about three videos that no longer exist. Life plays bad tricks sometimes to Ozu lovers.


Three film directors talking about Ozu: from Berlin Wim Wenders, from Helsinki Aki Kaurismäki, from Hong Kong Stanley Kwan.

All three videos have now English subtitles, but when I watched them first time the subtitles were missing. So I listened to German, Finnish and Chinese, while using copiously my imagination to overcome the three tongues.

I made some notes as I was watching the three directors speaking each in his own language and I will try now to present these videos as they were understood by me that first time, without subtitles. And let me remind you that I was forced to replace the three videos with three images. That's it :)

So, let's start with Wim Wenders. I have watched Tôkyô Ga, his movie dedicated to Ozu. The mood of Tôkyô Ga is sad: Wenders comes to Tokyo sometime in the 80's to find traces of the master, but traces cannot be found, as everything has changed. Another generation, other social issues, another atmosphere, old good times are gone.

Let's come back now to the video. My German is very poor, but I didn't worry. The images from Ozu's movies speak for themselves, and there is a great selection of them.

no copyright infringement intended
(http://movi.ca/movie/Tokyo-Ga/)



And now Aki Kaurismäki. Maybe some of you know German, but I doubt there is among my friends someone speaking Finnish. Again, there are here the images of Ozu, and, subtly, some soundtrack from his movies, creating a great atmosphere.



Director Stanley Kwan is from Hong Kong, so he speaks about Ozu in Chinese. You should watch this video because the references to Ozu are very subtle: there is one scene from Tôkyô Monogatari (the two grandparents alone, sitting in front of the sea: great scene putting drama and stasis together), there is the music that ends the video (captured from the soundtrack of Tôkyô Monogatari, as well), and especially there is the end image, from the same movie: the stasis that ends each of his movies and gives them that great metaphysical depth; the large river, or the sea, with some ships there, impassible to our dramas; our dramas are not that important in the cosmical order, and life goes on.

And only when I had the English subtitles I realized the power of the story in this video: Stanley Kwan parallels the memory of the difficult relationship between him and his own father, with the story told by Ozu.

no copyright infringement intended
(http://www.hkcinemagic.com/en/page.asp?aid=117&page=5)



(Yasujiro Ozu and Setsuko Hara)

Labels:

Monday, January 25, 2010

Ozu: The Munekata Sisters (1950)



Munekata kyōdai (The Munekata Sisters) - the story has a great elegance: Setsuko (played by Kinuyo Tanaka) is unhappily to Mimura, an engineer with no job and a bad drinking habit; she had always been in love with Hiroshi but both of them failed to propose when Hiroshi left for France a few years ago; now he is back and Mariko (Setsuko's sister) tries to reunite them; she too is secretly in love with Hiroshi. (I quoted here the summary offered on imdb by phs). It's the world of the heroes of Ozu, living their dramas with that unforgettable Chekhovian restraint.

The script, like in all Ozu's movies after the war, belongs to him and to Kôgo Noda. It's based on a novel by Jiro Osaragi, and here is what Ozu said about this movie (quoted by Donald Richie in his monograph, Ozu, His Life and Films), to be frank, I find it difficult to make a film out of a novel; you're forced into reworking the imagination of the author, and then have to select someone to play a role already created; when I write, I always write with an actor in mind from the beginning, and this helps create the role in film.

However Ozu overcame all these and gave us, with The Munekata Sisters, one of his gems.


(Yasujiro Ozu and Setsuko Hara)

Labels:

Friday, January 22, 2010

A Bit of Ozu in Illinois

It's morning, and a writer from Urbana, Illinois (P. Gregory Springer), is running his car while watching on his laptop movies by Ozu. Two universes in an unexpected meeting: the universe of Ozu, the universe of Illinois.



I think the movie from the first video is Tôkyô Monogatari, I don't know what movie is on the second video. If someone can help me, thanks in advance:)


(Yasujiro Ozu and Setsuko Hara)

Labels:

Saturday, December 05, 2009

Hou Hsiao-Hsien on Ozu


In the movies of Ozu family is a backdrop, says Hou Hsiao-Hsien: it's a study of a society in evolution: a daughter gets eventually married; only, this is observed on slightly different historic periods, and the difference is of two or three years, the end of the forties, the beginning of the fifties, the middle of the fifties: the evolution of post-war Japanese society followed very slowly, with great patience and love for the detail.

(Hou Hsiao-Hsien)

Labels: ,

Sunday, November 22, 2009

A Gift for Yoko

It's Sunday evening and I came back home from a long walk. I was tired and I took a bit of rest. I found then on youTube a video that I liked a lot: it's a French film director, Claire Denis, telling us how she arrived to love to movies of Ozu.

This is a gift for Yoko, as I know how much she loves Ozu, and Mizoguchi, and Kurosawa, and Naruse, but, I believe, most of all she loves Ozu.




(Yasujiro Ozu and Setsuko Hara)

(The Thousand faces of HANAFUBUKI)

Labels: ,

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Mattie - A Love Letter to Ozu


If you know Ozu's movies you'll be amazed by this video authored by Mattie. It's incredible: it's like Ozu came to Wednesbury to make these images.

Mattie is producing unbelievable videos.


















(Vlog of Mattie)

Labels: ,

Friday, April 03, 2009

The Early Spring of Mattie


(video by Matt)


This guy is fabulous. Mat, or Matt, or Mattie, as he changes often the way he likes to be called. Carrying for his gorgeous images only a lover ca do.

At the end a discreet tribute to Ozu: Shoshun (Early Spring) is his movie from 1956.

(Vlog of Mattie)

Labels: ,

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Ozu: Good Morning



Good Morning (Ohayô), a movie made by Ozu in 1959: two boys beg their parents for a television set, nagging them until all patience is lost. The parents order the boys to be quiet and the boys do exactly that--refusing to utter a word. The boys' silence ultimately puts the whole neighborhood into turmoil (Jim Beaver); unbearably cute (Joel Barhamand); very cool movie (loophole41). The plot follows loosely the situations from one of Ozu's silent movies (I Was Born, But..., made in 1932). Fine comedies both.

From my favorite actors, Chishu Ryu plays in Good Morning.

(Yasujiro Ozu and Setsuko Hara)

Labels: ,

Monday, March 23, 2009

Café Lumière



A movie starting with the logo of Shochiku Company. My heart is warming up: the logo Ozu's movies were starting with, his almost sixty movies, all produced at Shochiku.


Then it is the image of a light train, again reminding Ozu. From now on though, you feel there is another moviemaker, with a totally different style: director Hou Hsiao-Hsien. It's Café Lumière (Kôhî jikô), made in 2003, a homage to Yasujiro Ozu's centennial (a splendid video by AsianVirusNet could not be inserted here, unfortunately, due to its size).

I saw three such movies dedicated to Ozu: each one expressing a very different personality (Kiarostami, Wenders, Hou). An Iranian, a German, a Taiwanese. Hopefully I will find time to write about each one.

The movie of Hou Hsiao-Hsien is possibly the most disconcerting among the three. Kiarostami's Five Dedicated to Ozu is programmatically experimental: five cinematic poems about contingent facing eternity. You know what it is about from the very beginning. It's like an abstract painting: if you disagree with the non-figurative, then you don't look at. While the movie of Hou apparently has a plot, only it's just a pretext. So you are waiting for something to happen, in vain: Café Lumière is about something else.

Yoko is a young free-lance writer or something, living in today's Tokyo. She's trying to find some traces of a Taiwanese musician who lived in Japan between the two world wars. We are told at some point in the story that Yoko is three months pregnant; she is determined to remain a single mother (which worries her parents; Yoko sees them now and then).

Okay. There is also a young antiquarian (Hajime) who is a train buff and rides trains to record sounds: trains stopping in stations, doors opening, public announcements, doors closing, trains starting again, passengers' conversations. The guy is clearly in love for Yoko; they remain only best friends.

Meanwhile she goes by train here and there, enters cafés and bookstores, talks by phone with the antiquarian.

And this is it. Don't ask about the father of the future baby. Don't ask about things to happen. Don't ask about any outcome.



(video by ruidina)


In any movie of Ozu something happens, while the movies of Hou are meditative, depict an atmosphere (even when they are dedicated to Ozu :). Actually Hou's passion for Ozu is visible also in other movies. The final part in Millennium Mambo is clearly suggesting Ozu (while remaining Hou hundred percent). Or one of the first sequences in Good Men, Good Women: there is a TV monitor and a movie is running; it's Late Spring, the scene of the bikes (it was my first encounter with Ozu).

I'm trying to understand: is there a difference in the scale of values between the movies made by Hou Hsiao-Hsien up to the start of the new millennium and his newer movies? I saw Flowers of Shanghai, then The Puppetmaster, and I was impressed. I saw Good Men, Good Women, then Goodbye, South, Goodbye, then Millennium Mambo: it took a long time to get their point, to range them on my scale.

Flowers of Shanghai calls in mind Chekhov (and Mateiu Caragiale - if you haven't heard about him it's bad for you - only you'd need Romanian knowledge to read him, even very good knowledge). Millennium Mambo is a journey in the sordid world of youngsters good of nothing, small thieves (now and then), night club hostesses, petty gangsters; it is an initiatic journey, to discover that our dreams are snowmen who melt at sunrise - we live in the country of snowmen and we don't know it.

Well, you cannot say that these movies have a definite plot, either; it's all about exploring universes; the thing is that their universes are large, while Hou's newer movies are intimist. Café Lumière: a young writer who doesn't find topics of discussion with her parents and befriends a young antiquarian with a passion for train sounds. Three Times: three couples of lovers who talk and look at each other in 1911, 1965, 2005. Le Voyage du Ballon Rouge: a kid, a single mother, a young Taiwanese, all three exploring Parisian streets, Chinese puppet theaters in Paris, Parisian attics - while the director is trying with his movie to find the atmosphere of an older Paris, the one of Lamorisse (do you remember his Ballon Rouge?)

It was Le Voyage du Ballon Rouge that gave me the clue for Café Lumière. The plot is just a pretext. It's actually about Hou Hsiao-Hsien himself: the Taiwanese director coming to Tokyo and looking for some old Nippon atmosphere of good Ozu's times.

And everything starts to make sense. The main character often travels to Taiwan where she teaches Japanese. The musician who lived in Tokyo between the two world wars was a Taiwanese.

He was a real person (Jiang Wen-Ye), who composed delicate music resembling jazz, Formosan Dance, Three Dances, Maggio Suite, Bagatelles - they sound fine and as I was listening to them another great musician came to my mind, maybe one of the greatest of the past century: Conlon Nancarrow.

Watching Café Lumière and listening, together with Yoko and Hajime, to a piano piece of the Taiwanese who became a Japanese, while feeling how your memory's calling a player-piano piece by Nancarrow: that's the movie, it has no plot at all; it has charm a lot.



Yes, everything makes now sense. Yoko befriended the young antiquarian and visits him at the bookstore, they browse together old books, and old maps of Tokyo, trying to locate an old café, DAT, that was frequented by the Taiwanese musician in the thirties: he was spending evenings and nights there, listening jazz, thinking at his compositions.

It is the journey of Hou, actually, towards the Tokyo of between the wars and of the fifties; a journey suggested by old books and old maps examined within old second-hand bookstores; suggested by old pieces of music, listened in narrow spaces, so narrow that only a whisper could find room between the two friends; suggested by elegant cafés or old neighborhoods.



And of course DAT, the old café, is no more, replaced by an impersonal office building (the site is hardly discovered, by asking old waiters in small pubs, the folks who always keep pieces of history within themselves).

The family from Ozu's time is no more, either. Yoko is not Noriko of Setsuko Hara, ready to sacrifice herself for the parents; on the contrary, she is a very independent girl, very remote to her parents' values and worries, taking her pregnancy very matter of factly, committed to remain a single mother rather than giving up freedom, taking a friendship with a boy her age as it is, nothing more.

Is it anything that remained, from the old times of Ozu? Not much, or rather nothing. The nostalgia for those years, that's all. They are dreaming at traditional dishes with old spices, at a small drink slowly tasted : there is a scene in the movie, with Yoko and her parents together in a small restaurant - it is in vain. Ozu died and his world is over.



However, there is something that remained. It's hardly to define it: that special warmth between two people, Yoko and her friend, lonely together, even when they are looking for each other: a superb scene with her traveling in a train, while he is in another train on a parallel track; the two are like together for a second, then the trains take each one its tunnel; after a while, she's falling asleep in a train car, he enters the place and is looking at her with a warm smile, letting her sleep; minimalism at its best.



What about Ozu's trains? Well, Hou creates with them a world of its own, tracks over tracks in all directions, with trains leaving tunnels to enter other tunnels to meet never; but this is the merit of the great image director, Lee Pin-Bing, one of the greatest in the world. He made the image for almost all Hou's movies (and also for Tian's Springtime in a Small Town).



Is now Hou inferior to his older movies? Maybe not, but his universe became condensed as aiming to be a black hole. The great subjects of Taiwan's history were in the past. Now it's about studying a detail, a single detail, with delicacy and patience, to pull up a diamond.

---------------------------------------------------

A small surprise in the end: I found on the web something you'll enjoy; the Formosan Dance:



(Hou Hsiao-Hsien)

Labels: ,

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Late Spring - The Authority of Nietzsche



When Zarathustra was thirty years old, he left his home and the lake of his home...


Let's discuss one of the scenes from Ozu's Banshun (Late Spring): the last night in Kyoto. Father (Chishu Ryu) and daughter (Setsuko Hara) are preparing their baggage as the following day they would leave for Tokyo.

They had taken for the trip a lot of books and now they are packaging them. So sometimes they hand books one another, as his books should go into his baggage and her into hers.

And suddenly the daughter said one of the most touching sentences ever, father, even if you get married I'd like to remain with you; I want to be always on your side.

This is too much for him: how could he possibly say no? He is just a father, just a poor being, and he knows very well that he would actually not get re-married, that he would remain alone for the rest of his life.

However he must say no.

It happens that exactly in that moment he has the book of Nietzsche in his hands, Also Sprach Zarathustra. And what follows is like the father takes his forces from that book. He speaks much longer than he did for all the rest of the movie; and he speaks with authority. It is about her duty to build together with her future husband their happiness; it will not be easy, it never was; it will take long, long years, and it will be hard; that is her duty in the world.

How can he speak with such determination?

It is not his will, it is the will of Nietzsche! Unconsciously, he places himself under the moral authority of the great philosopher and he finds there the courage to say what needs to be said.




(Yasujiro Ozu and Setsuko Hara)

(Nietzsche)

(Richard Strauss)

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Vlog of Mattie



Mattie (or Mat, or Matt) is a formidable vlogger; his videos speak in unforgettable images of his passion for some great movie makers.

Here are some thoughts Mattie has put on the frontispiece of his youTube channel. Three short meditations leading to the conclusion. Each one calls remotely in mind some organization of a haiku while it has the apparent weirdness of a koan. I recognize in them the philosophical approach expressed by the movies of Ozu: it is the void that gives sense to our immanent.

We put thirty spokes together and call it a wheel,


But it is on the space where there is nothing that the usefulness of the wheel depends.


We turn clay to make a vessel,


But it is on the space where there is nothing that the usefulness of the vessel depends.


We pierce doors and windows to make a house,


And it is on these spaces where there is nothing that the usefulness of the house depends.


Therefore just as we take advantage of what is, we should recognize the usefulness of what is not.

(Blogosphere)



(Filmofilia)

Labels: , ,